This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the SilkAir Flight 185 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months ![]() |
![]() | This article is written in Singaporean English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, centre, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on December 19, 2012, December 19, 2017, December 19, 2023, and December 19, 2024. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Fatalities
edit103 fatalities -- but only 3 families??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ° (talk • contribs) 21:44, August 21, 2006 (UTC)
Actually there was one survivor who made it out over the over wing exit — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.11.46.119 (talk) 23:59, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Worlds longest grammar commas ive ever seen
editHere Although the NTSB and PCU manufacturer Parker-Hannifin had already determined that the PCU was properly working, and thus not the cause of the crash, a private and independent investigation into the crash for a civil lawsuit tried by jury in Los Angeles County Superior Court, which was not allowed to hear or consider the NTSB's and Parker-Hannifin's conclusions, decided that the crash was caused by a defective servo valve inside the PCU based on forensic findings from an electron microscope, which determined that minute defects within the PCU had caused the rudder hard-over and a subsequent uncontrollable flight and crash
Long sentences always interrupted by commas thus rejecting any possibilities to the verb.(possibly)182.3.46.118 (talk) 23:10, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
jurisdiction
editThe state where the crash occurred usually has jurisdiction over accident investigation. In the event that it occurs in international waters, then the state of registration has jurisdiction. State of manufacture does not have any sway in this Guinness2702 (talk) 12:46, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- These days, the state of manufacture is entitled to an associated representative + advisers: https://www.icao.int/Newsroom/Pages/Aftermath-of-an-Aircraft-Accident-ICAOs-role-in-accident-investigation-.aspx. Although I suppose that might not be "jurisdiction" over the investigation itself per se, so I've updated the article. BalinKingOfMoria (talk) 14:23, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- I'd still assume that they "assisted the investigation" rather than "investigated" as is the norm, but since I don't know any better and can't say for sure, I'll just thank you for your improvement and move on. Guinness2702 (talk) 21:51, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Tsu Way Ming
editThe captain of SilkAir 185 I didn't captain making an deliberately crashed Wolf320 (talk) 03:22, 5 March 2025 (UTC)